Posts Tagged SCRM

Federal Government Lifts Cargo Insurance Coverage Requirement

Caveat Emptor!  The carrier you may be hiring to move your shipments (or your supplier delivering your shipments) is no longer required by the US government to maintain a minimum level of cargo insurance.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration issued a ruling that became effective on March 21st that allowed commercial shippers to no longer maintain a set level of cargo insurance.  Citing that most of the commercial carriers are maintaining a higher level of insurance coverage than the minimum, and this stipulation falls outside the regulatory responsibility.

While this change will probably not affect your shipments, it is important to watch out for changes in the agreement you have with your carriers.  It would be easy at this time to reduce coverage by raising deductible, reducing normal coverage amounts or in extreme cases no longer provide coverage for product moving on their vehicles.

Full information on the change and an article weighing the pro’s and cons can be found here.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

Advances in Supply Chain? Thank a Veteran

There’s an old saying that an Army travels on it’s stomach.  The importance of supplies in keeping an army (or navy or

Members of WWII's the Red Ball Express

air force, or marine) unit moving has been a primary focus since Hannibal crossed the Alps.  Great military leaders understood the importance of getting supplies to the troops and made sure it happened.

The use of railroads, convoys,  air cargo planes, and packaging are a result of military need, or were improved because of military need.

Today’s posting is not about risk in supply chain, it’s about honoring the men and women of the military who have served, both on the field of battle and in support roles. 

To those brave men and women who have protected this country. . .

Thank You!

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Seven risks of partnering for supplier resources

In the October 11th issue of Business Week, there was a short article talking about Walmart’s drive to partner with their suppliers to increase bargaining power with raw material resources (“Walmart Wants More Buying Clout” ).  Walmart is looking to partner with their suppliers (like Pepsico) to purchase raw materials (like sugar and potatoes) jointly in order to reduce the product cost because of the combined volume purchased from the two entities together.

This is not a new or novel concept.  Buying Groups have been around for years in order to help reduce costs and increase profits and have been very successful.  There are also down sides to the world of buying groups that, if not properly managed can land you in a world of trouble with the government from anti trust laws. 

While it’s important to understand the implications of anti trust laws and address them if the situation warrants, I would like to talk about other supply chain risks associated with this type of an agreement.

One.  How would this partnership affect your current suppliers?  Would it put an undue burden on them that could affect quality, delivery, your relationship with them? Or will you continue to use your current supplier?   A smart supply chain manager is looking at the suppliers and monitoring the volume not only of the direct supplier, but also the supplier’s sources to assure a continuous supply of material needed in order to keep the factory running. 

Two.  In building the partnership will this require single sourcing of all supplies?  That’s where the benefit of volume comes in.  Building a large enough “buy” that helps your supplier project volume and realize cost saving for them that are necessary to pass any additional breaks down the line.  Are you ready to take on the risk of single sourcing?  (and if you are single sourcing right now do you realize the risks?)

Three  Is this a partnership that makes sense?  Will it last the test of time and you have no fear that your customer will not: a)  get into financial difficulty and not be able to complete their portion of the buy.  b)   drop the product line and leave you responsible for the entire buy c) decide to partner with someone else and leave the buying group and you responsible for the entire buy d) not pay for their portion of the material received and leave you responsible for the costs of their goods e) be involved in a operational issue or recall that you could be associated with. 

Fourth  Will this partnership provide to much information to your customer that could be trade or company secrets to your product that could affect the brand?  In today’s information rich environment a good analyst with marginal computing power can extrapolate random bits of information and tie them together to get the “secret formula”.  If you partner for one item, your organization is probably safe, if you extend it across the board, there is a chance the secret could get out.

Five  How will this affect the pricing and profit of your product?  If your product is unique and can maintain a higher demand that allows you to price accordingly, that should not be a problem, However if you have been commoditized and in order to maintain market share, your pricing is forced down to meet competition threats, will you be able to maintain that price should the partnership dissolve and higher supply pricing is once again in place?  Remember to look at your partner’s marketing and business strategy, especially if you are in competition with a store brand or private label product.

Six Do you feel comfortable in losing control of the supplier negotiations?  Adding a another player to the mix changes the negotiation process.  Each party brings it’s own agenda and expectations to the dance, from the size, shape of the table to the locations of the negotiations, to the most important factor of the agreement, some of which may be different than yours.

Seven  How does this change your relationship with the customer?  Does this give your customer more leverage over your organization from a buying standpoint or does it build greater ties to your customer that makes it more difficult for your competitors to gain inroads into their organization?

When assessing risk for the supply chain area of an organization, Operational and Financial risk should be the primary factors, with Reputation a close third.  Delving into a partnership such as this or a buying group is a strategic business decision, filled with risks including the traditional SCRM focust and adding many more.  Any partnership with a customer other than the traditional relationship should be carefully reviewed with the pro’s and con’s weighed before moving forward.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,